| Window | Theses | Resolved | Wins | Win rate | Avg return | Median return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1d | 2 | 2 | 1 | 50% | -34.1% | -34.1% |
| 3d | 2 | 2 | 1 | 50% | -42.4% | -42.4% |
| 1w | 2 | 2 | 1 | 50% | -39.2% | -39.2% |
| 1m | 2 | 2 | 1 | 50% | -27.0% | -27.0% |
| 3m | 2 | 2 | 1 | 50% | -16.6% | -16.6% |
| 6m | 2 | 2 | 1 | 50% | -20.0% | -20.0% |
| 1y | 2 | 2 | 1 | 50% | -35.9% | -35.9% |
Past performance does not predict future results. Informational only.
Silver squeeze narrative is a hedgefund-coordinated distraction to pull capital away from GME and into a commodity with infinite paper contracts that hedgefunds themselves profit from. Physical silver is finite but paper SLV is not a viable short squeeze target.
Hedgefunds are short billions of dollars and bleeding every day they don't cover, creating an inevitable short squeeze. Institutions have reported owning more shares than exist (102M+ reported vs 71M issued), with retail potentially holding 100%+ of the company including options, meaning eventual forced covering will allow retail to set the price.
End of results.