| Window | Theses | Resolved | Wins | Win rate | Avg return | Median return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1d | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — |
| 3d | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0% | -28.3% | -25.3% |
| 1w | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0% | -35.9% | -31.2% |
| 1m | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0% | -31.5% | -30.5% |
| 3m | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0% | -22.8% | -23.7% |
| 6m | 4 | 4 | 2 | 50% | +35.9% | -2.0% |
| 1y | 4 | 4 | 2 | 50% | -13.5% | -11.5% |
Past performance does not predict future results. Informational only.
The author recommends Nokia as part of the BANG GANG alternative to silver, grouping it with GME, AMC, and BlackBerry as the legitimate squeeze plays.
The author recommends AMC as part of the BANG GANG alternative to silver, positioning it alongside GME as part of the broader coordinated squeeze play.
The author recommends BlackBerry as part of the BANG GANG (Blackberry, AMC, Nokia, GME) alternative to silver as a hedge or alternative investment play tied to the broader squeeze narrative.
The author argues that GME remains the righteous core trade and that a silver squeeze narrative is a hedge-fund coordinated distraction to drain capital from GME momentum. He advocates holding/buying GME and related BANG stocks as the legitimate squeeze opportunity.
End of results.